PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTIF vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTIF vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTIF achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.67% return.


CTIF

1D
0.03%
1M
2.46%
YTD
5.33%
6M
4.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.44%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.79%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTIF vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CTIF
Castellan Targeted Income ETF
5.33%4.75%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
10.67%15.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CTIF and PEPS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTIF vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTIF

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTIF vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CTIF vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTIFPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.05

-0.15

Drawdowns

CTIF vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTIF drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIF and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTIFPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-21.26%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-2.77%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

Volatility

CTIF vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTIFPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

13.06%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.39%

18.31%

-5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.39%

18.31%

-5.92%

CTIF vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTIF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTIF vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CTIF
Castellan Targeted Income ETF
3.65%2.55%0.00%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.88%1.00%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTIF and PEPS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTIF.

CTIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Castellan and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTIF and 0.10% for PEPS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTIF and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer