CTIF vs. IVVW
CTIF (Castellan Targeted Income ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Over the past year, CTIF returned 6.93% vs 17.25% for IVVW. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTIF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.
Performance
CTIF vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTIF achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 5.15% return.
CTIF
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVW
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 6M
- 5.10%
- 1Y
- 17.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTIF vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF | 3.33% | 3.87% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 5.15% | 12.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTIF and IVVW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.61 |
The correlation between CTIF and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTIF vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank
CTIF
IVVW
CTIF vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTIF | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.47 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 3.00 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.85 | 15.95 | -13.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTIF vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTIF drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIF and IVVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTIF | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -16.79% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -5.81% | -3.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -0.29% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -1.73% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 1.09% | +1.51% |
Volatility
CTIF vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison
Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 3.58%. This indicates that CTIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTIF | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 3.58% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 6.96% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 8.08% | +4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 12.68% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 12.68% | -0.10% |
CTIF vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTIF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTIF vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison
CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than IVVW's 19.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF | 3.72% | 2.55% | 0.00% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.65% | 18.55% | 13.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTIF and IVVW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTIF has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to IVVW (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTIF dropped -9.43% vs IVVW's -16.79%.
On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 17.25% vs 6.93% for CTIF. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 17.25% return vs 6.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTIF.
IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.65%, compared with 3.72% for CTIF.
They also come from different issuers: Castellan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTIF and 0.25% for IVVW.
IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTIF and IVVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer