CTIF vs. AVGW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CTIF (Castellan Targeted Income ETF) and AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTIF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AVGW.

Performance

CTIF vs. AVGW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTIF achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than AVGW's 43.84% return.

CTIF

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 4.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVGW

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: 17.30%
• YTD: 43.84%
• 6M: 27.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTIF vs. AVGW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF	5.33%	1.23%
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	43.84%	20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CTIF and AVGW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

CTIF vs. AVGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTIF	AVGW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	1.69	-0.80

Drawdowns

CTIF vs. AVGW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTIF drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum AVGW drawdown of -34.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIF and AVGW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTIF	AVGW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-34.65%	+25.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.38%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.89%	-12.19%	+10.30%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTIF	AVGW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	53.65%	-41.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.39%	53.65%	-41.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.39%	53.65%	-41.26%

CTIF vs. AVGW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTIF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTIF vs. AVGW - Dividend Comparison

CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than AVGW's 44.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	44.45%	31.15%
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF	3.65%	2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTIF and AVGW in my portfolio?

CTIF and AVGW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CTIF or AVGW?

On fees, CTIF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTIF or AVGW?

CTIF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTIF or AVGW?

AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 44.45%, compared with 3.65% for CTIF.

What is the main difference between CTIF and AVGW?

They also come from different issuers: Castellan and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTIF and 0.99% for AVGW.