CTIF vs. AVGW
CTIF (Castellan Targeted Income ETF) and AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTIF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AVGW.
Performance
CTIF vs. AVGW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CTIF having a 3.33% return and AVGW slightly higher at 3.41%.
CTIF
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGW
- 1D
- -4.65%
- 1M
- -22.42%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTIF vs. AVGW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF | 3.33% | 1.35% |
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 3.41% | 20.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTIF and AVGW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTIF vs. AVGW — Risk / Return Rank
CTIF
AVGW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CTIF vs. AVGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTIF | AVGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTIF vs. AVGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTIF drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum AVGW drawdown of -34.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIF and AVGW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTIF | AVGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -34.65% | +25.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -29.10% | +26.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -12.91% | +11.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | — | — |
Volatility
CTIF vs. AVGW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTIF | AVGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 57.16% | -44.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 57.16% | -44.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 57.16% | -44.58% |
CTIF vs. AVGW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTIF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTIF vs. AVGW - Dividend Comparison
CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than AVGW's 66.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 66.78% | 31.15% |
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF | 3.72% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTIF and AVGW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTIF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTIF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.
AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 66.78%, compared with 3.72% for CTIF.
They also come from different issuers: Castellan and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTIF and 0.99% for AVGW.
Find the right allocation for CTIF and AVGW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer