CTEN.DE vs. ECAT
CTEN.DE (CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both funds - CTEN.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while ECAT is a Derivative Income fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, CTEN.DE returned 17.30%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for ECAT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTEN.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for ECAT.
Performance
CTEN.DE vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CTEN.DE is traded in EUR, while ECAT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ECAT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEN.DE achieves a -30.10% return, which is significantly lower than ECAT's 12.71% return.
CTEN.DE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -17.15%
- YTD
- -30.10%
- 6M
- -36.14%
- 1Y
- -36.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECAT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 12.71%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 18.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEN.DE vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEN.DE CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP | -30.10% | -19.43% | 96.51% | 53.65% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 12.71% | 2.79% | 27.88% | 15.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEN.DE and ECAT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEN.DE vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
CTEN.DE
ECAT
CTEN.DE vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTEN.DE | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.24 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 1.73 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 5.79 | -6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTEN.DE | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.76 | 1.35 | -2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.57 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
CTEN.DE vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEN.DE and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEN.DE | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.27% | -22.99% | -33.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.27% | -10.71% | -45.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.27% | -19.89% | -36.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.40% | -0.87% | -54.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.06% | -6.61% | -12.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.71% | 3.19% | +30.52% |
Volatility
CTEN.DE vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) at 3.18%. This indicates that CTEN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEN.DE | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 3.18% | +6.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.00% | 10.37% | +24.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.20% | 13.74% | +35.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.10% | 16.57% | +35.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.10% | 16.57% | +35.53% |
CTEN.DE vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEN.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEN.DE vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
CTEN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEN.DE CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 21.67% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEN.DE and ECAT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CTEN.DE and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer