PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CTEK.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CTEK.L is traded in USD, while CHRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CHRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEK.L achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than CHRG.L's 7.64% return.


CTEK.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-13.91%
6M
0.34%
YTD
11.69%
1Y
48.73%
3Y*
-5.57%
5Y*
10Y*

CHRG.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
-14.96%
6M
-3.32%
YTD
7.64%
1Y
41.15%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CTEK.L
Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.69%53.41%-33.55%-21.76%-17.31%-19.38%
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
7.64%55.18%-13.38%-4.90%-27.75%-7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEK.L and CHRG.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.80

The correlation between CTEK.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEK.L
CTEK.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CTEK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CHRG.L
CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CTEK.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTEK.LCHRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.76

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

6.12

-0.68

CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEK.L and CHRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEK.L drawdown since its inception was -73.85%, which is greater than CHRG.L's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEK.L and CHRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEK.LCHRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.85%

-55.49%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.44%

-23.28%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.73%

-39.75%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.61%

-22.18%

-18.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.62%

-24.08%

-20.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.34%

6.70%

+2.64%

Volatility

CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CTEK.L) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) at 10.18%. This indicates that CTEK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEK.LCHRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.41%

10.18%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.55%

23.01%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.49%

30.77%

+7.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.95%

28.50%

+8.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.95%

3,116.04%

-3,079.09%

CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEK.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTEK.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CTEK.L nor CHRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CTEK.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHRG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHRG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CTEK.L.

CTEK.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while CHRG.L is Lithium & Battery Metals. CTEK.L tracks Indxx Global CleanTech v2 Index, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CTEK.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEK.L and CHRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer