PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CTEK.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CTEK.L is traded in USD, while BOTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BOTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEK.L achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's -1.66% return.


CTEK.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-13.91%
6M
0.34%
YTD
11.69%
1Y
48.73%
3Y*
-5.57%
5Y*
10Y*

BOTG.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-5.36%
6M
-5.21%
YTD
-1.66%
1Y
11.09%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CTEK.L
Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.69%53.41%-33.55%-21.76%-17.31%-19.38%
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
-1.66%13.42%13.09%39.59%-42.85%-29.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEK.L and BOTG.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.64

The correlation between CTEK.L and BOTG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEK.L
CTEK.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CTEK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTG.L
BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CTEK.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTEK.LBOTG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.09

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

0.60

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

1.45

+4.00

CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEK.L and BOTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEK.L drawdown since its inception was -73.85%, which is greater than BOTG.L's maximum drawdown of -65.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEK.L and BOTG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEK.LBOTG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.85%

-65.02%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.44%

-18.35%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.73%

-28.56%

-35.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.61%

-29.11%

-11.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.62%

-41.83%

-2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.34%

7.66%

+1.68%

Volatility

CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CTEK.L) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) at 9.50%. This indicates that CTEK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEK.LBOTG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.41%

9.50%

+3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.55%

23.20%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.49%

27.83%

+10.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.95%

31.29%

+5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.95%

31.29%

+5.66%

CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CTEK.L and BOTG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

CTEK.L vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

CTEK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.33%0.27%0.24%0.08%
CTEK.L
Global X CleanTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTEK.L and BOTG.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTEK.L and BOTG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

CTEK.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while BOTG.L is Robotics. CTEK.L tracks Indxx Global CleanTech v2 Index, while BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEK.L and BOTG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer