PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEF vs. PWRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEF vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 33.21% return, which is significantly higher than PWRD's 13.74% return.


CTEF

1D
0.33%
1M
-4.17%
6M
28.28%
YTD
33.21%
1Y
64.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
69.37%

PWRD

1D
-0.49%
1M
-9.05%
6M
7.80%
YTD
13.74%
1Y
19.09%
3Y*
27.96%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEF vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
33.21%33.10%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
13.74%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEF and PWRD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.80

The correlation between CTEF and PWRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEF vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEF
CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PWRD
PWRD Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PWRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWRD Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PWRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWRD Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEF vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTEFPWRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.14

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

1.36

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.08

4.14

+14.94

CTEF vs. PWRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the PWRD Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEF and PWRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTEF vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum PWRD drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and PWRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEFPWRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-25.87%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

-14.12%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.75%

-11.10%

+5.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-5.09%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

4.62%

-1.24%

Volatility

CTEF vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) is 6.70%, while TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that CTEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEFPWRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

12.00%

-5.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.32%

22.52%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.21%

26.90%

-3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.50%

23.22%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

23.22%

-0.72%

CTEF vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTEF vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison

CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, which matches PWRD's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
0.06%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
0.06%0.22%0.49%0.78%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTEF and PWRD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWRD has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to CTEF (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEF dropped -15.00% vs PWRD's -25.87%.

On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 64.32% vs 19.09% for PWRD. On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CTEF has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 64.32% return vs 19.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

CTEF and PWRD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.06%.

CTEF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Castellan and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTEF and 0.75% for PWRD.

CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEF and PWRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer