CTEF vs. PWRD
CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Castellan, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CTEF returned 64.32% vs 19.09% for PWRD. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CTEF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRD.
Performance
CTEF vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 33.21% return, which is significantly higher than PWRD's 13.74% return.
CTEF
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- 6M
- 28.28%
- YTD
- 33.21%
- 1Y
- 64.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 69.37%
PWRD
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -9.05%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 27.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.22%
CTEF vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 33.21% | 33.10% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 13.74% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEF and PWRD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between CTEF and PWRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEF vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank
CTEF
PWRD
CTEF vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTEF | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.14 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 1.36 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.08 | 4.14 | +14.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTEF vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum PWRD drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and PWRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEF | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | -25.87% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -14.12% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -11.10% | +5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -5.09% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 4.62% | -1.24% |
Volatility
CTEF vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) is 6.70%, while TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that CTEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEF | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 12.00% | -5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.32% | 22.52% | -3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.21% | 26.90% | -3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 23.22% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 23.22% | -0.72% |
CTEF vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEF vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison
CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, which matches PWRD's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.06% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.78% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEF and PWRD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWRD has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to CTEF (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEF dropped -15.00% vs PWRD's -25.87%.
On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 64.32% vs 19.09% for PWRD. On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CTEF has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 64.32% return vs 19.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.
CTEF and PWRD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.06%.
CTEF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Castellan and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTEF and 0.75% for PWRD.
CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTEF and PWRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer