CTEF vs. GRNJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTEF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.

Performance

CTEF vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 36.91% return, which is significantly higher than GRNJ's 22.19% return.

CTEF

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: 13.53%
• YTD: 36.91%
• 6M: 33.85%
• 1Y: 81.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRNJ

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: 1.56%
• YTD: 22.19%
• 6M: 17.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEF vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	36.91%	5.22%
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	22.19%	6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEF and GRNJ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

CTEF vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEF

CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 93
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 94

GRNJ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEF vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEF	GRNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.48	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.43	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.12	—	—

Drawdowns

CTEF vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum GRNJ drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and GRNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEF	GRNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.00%	-17.32%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-4.23%	+1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-4.09%	+2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTEF	GRNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.64%	30.86%	-8.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.56%	30.86%	-8.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.56%	30.86%	-8.30%

CTEF vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEF vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison

CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	0.06%	0.08%
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEF and GRNJ in my portfolio?

CTEF and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CTEF or GRNJ?

On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEF or GRNJ?

CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEF or GRNJ?

CTEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

What is the main difference between CTEF and GRNJ?

They also come from different issuers: Castellan and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTEF and 0.75% for GRNJ.