CTEF vs. DRES

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) and DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CTEF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRES.

Performance

CTEF vs. DRES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 35.91% return, which is significantly higher than DRES's 23.63% return.

CTEF

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -0.30%
• 6M: 25.55%
• YTD: 35.91%
• 1Y: 63.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 69.35%

DRES

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 1.99%
• 6M: 12.66%
• YTD: 23.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	$472.94K	$711.02K	$362.93K
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	$92.04K	$76.48K	$67.73K

CTEF vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	35.91%	2.60%
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	23.63%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEF and DRES is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

CTEF vs. DRES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CTEF

CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 92
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 93

DRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CTEF vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEF	DRES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.28	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.06	—	—

Drawdowns

CTEF vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, which is greater than DRES's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and DRES.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEF	DRES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.00%	-10.41%	-4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	0.00%	-3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-2.13%	+0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTEF	DRES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.59%	18.11%	+5.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.65%	18.11%	+4.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.65%	18.11%	+4.54%

CTEF vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DRES's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEF vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison

CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than DRES's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	0.06%	0.08%
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	0.51%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEF and DRES in my portfolio?

CTEF and DRES have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CTEF or DRES?

On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEF or DRES?

CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEF or DRES?

DRES has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

What is the main difference between CTEF and DRES?

They also come from different issuers: Castellan and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTEF and 0.50% for DRES.