CTEC vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CTEC (Global X CleanTech ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEC is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. CTEC is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, CTEC returned 82.20% vs 115.98% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. CTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

CTEC vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEC achieves a 19.59% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 17.65% return.

CTEC

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -16.24%
• YTD: 19.59%
• 6M: 16.23%
• 1Y: 82.20%
• 3Y*: -2.52%
• 5Y*: -8.33%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 45.64%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 21.49%
• 1Y: 115.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEC vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF	19.59%	69.20%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	17.65%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEC and WNTR is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.44

Return for Risk

CTEC vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEC

CTEC Risk / Return Rank: 74
CTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
CTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEC vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEC	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	2.20	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.46	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.33	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	2.73	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	6.99	+3.86

CTEC vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEC and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CTEC vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEC drawdown since its inception was -81.58%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEC and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEC	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.58%	-42.65%	-38.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.39%	-42.65%	+23.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.64%	-4.02%	-50.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.35%	-20.87%	-31.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.60%	16.66%	-9.06%

Volatility

CTEC vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) is 15.65%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that CTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTEC	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.65%	18.14%	-2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.18%	46.41%	-19.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.39%	53.16%	-15.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.94%	53.31%	-16.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.08%	53.31%	-15.23%

CTEC vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEC vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

CTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF	0.63%	0.75%	1.56%	0.51%	0.25%	0.39%	0.02%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	94.34%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEC and WNTR in my portfolio?

CTEC and WNTR have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTEC or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to CTEC (15.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEC dropped -81.58% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, CTEC or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 82.20% for CTEC. On fees, CTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CTEC has been the lower-risk option at 15.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CTEC or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 82.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEC or WNTR?

CTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEC or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 0.63% for CTEC.

What is the main difference between CTEC and WNTR?

CTEC is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CTEC and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.