CTEC vs. SPMO
CTEC (Global X CleanTech ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEC is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CTEC returned -3.60%/yr vs 23.92%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
CTEC vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEC achieves a 42.92% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 28.45% return.
CTEC
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 42.92%
- 6M
- 34.82%
- 1Y
- 130.53%
- 3Y*
- 2.12%
- 5Y*
- -3.60%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 28.45%
- 6M
- 27.50%
- 1Y
- 43.92%
- 3Y*
- 42.27%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 20.77%
CTEC vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF | 42.92% | 57.85% | -36.35% | -25.60% | -16.82% | -22.19% | 47.46% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.45% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEC and SPMO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.49 |
The correlation between CTEC and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CTEC vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CTEC
SPMO
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
CTEC
SPMO
Energy
CTEC
SPMO
Technology
CTEC
SPMO
Basic Materials
CTEC
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
CTEC
SPMO
Utilities
CTEC
SPMO
Communication Services
CTEC
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
CTEC
-
SPMO
Financial Services
CTEC
-
SPMO
Healthcare
CTEC
-
SPMO
Real Estate
CTEC
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEC vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
CTEC
SPMO
CTEC vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTEC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.44 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.45 | 3.47 | +3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.38 | 13.52 | +5.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTEC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76 | 2.49 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 1.25 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 1.00 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
CTEC vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEC drawdown since its inception was -81.58%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEC and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.58% | -30.95% | -50.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -12.70% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.77% | -20.13% | -45.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.46% | -22.74% | -53.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.78% | -1.46% | -44.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.38% | -4.60% | -47.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.76% | 3.26% | +3.50% |
Volatility
CTEC vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 7.39%. This indicates that CTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.93% | 7.39% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.73% | 14.49% | +9.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.93% | 17.70% | +17.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 19.30% | +17.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 20.31% | +17.44% |
CTEC vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEC vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
CTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SPMO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 1.56% | 0.51% | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEC and SPMO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTEC has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to SPMO (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEC dropped -81.58% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 23.92% vs -3.60% for CTEC. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 23.92% return vs -3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CTEC.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.52% for CTEC.
CTEC is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. CTEC tracks Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CTEC and 0.13% for SPMO.
CTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTEC and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer