PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTCAX vs. CREEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTCAX vs. CREEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) and Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund (CREEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTCAX achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly lower than CREEX's 20.76% return. Over the past 10 years, CTCAX has outperformed CREEX with an annualized return of 22.83%, while CREEX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.65% annualized return.


CTCAX

1D
5.75%
1M
-3.72%
6M
16.09%
YTD
18.39%
1Y
32.88%
3Y*
27.89%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
22.83%
ALL TIME*
17.93%

CREEX

1D
-1.35%
1M
1.29%
6M
17.72%
YTD
20.76%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
5.65%
ALL TIME*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CTCAX vs. CREEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
18.39%24.78%31.39%56.46%-34.81%22.73%49.46%43.91%-1.48%42.99%
CREEX
Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund
20.76%0.19%7.40%16.20%-25.10%41.91%-3.54%28.40%-7.21%4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CTCAX and CREEX is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2002

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between CTCAX and CREEX has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTCAX vs. CREEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CTCAX
CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CREEX
CREEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CREEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CREEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CREEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CREEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CREEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CTCAX vs. CREEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) and Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund (CREEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTCAXCREEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.93

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.18

9.74

-3.57

CTCAX vs. CREEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the CREEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTCAX and CREEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTCAX vs. CREEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTCAX drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, smaller than the maximum CREEX drawdown of -70.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTCAX and CREEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTCAXCREEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.04%

-70.78%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-7.94%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.67%

-19.89%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.55%

-31.25%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.55%

-41.42%

+1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.35%

-2.48%

-7.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-10.67%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

2.40%

+2.37%

Volatility

CTCAX vs. CREEX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund (CREEX) at 4.81%. This indicates that CTCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CREEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTCAXCREEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

4.81%

+5.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.57%

10.92%

+11.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.35%

14.27%

+12.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.92%

19.11%

+7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.27%

20.72%

+4.55%

CTCAX vs. CREEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTCAX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CREEX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTCAX vs. CREEX - Dividend Comparison

CTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than CREEX's 5.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CREEX
Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund
5.55%6.26%10.13%32.32%5.92%6.41%7.50%12.02%8.22%14.73%4.23%8.59%
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
2.78%3.29%1.08%2.36%3.53%4.15%0.91%2.55%5.82%3.52%0.36%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTCAX and CREEX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTCAX has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to CREEX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTCAX dropped -61.04% vs CREEX's -70.78%.

CREEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTCAX and CREEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer