PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CTC-A.TO is traded in CAD, while LDOS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDOS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTC-A.TO achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than LDOS's -35.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CTC-A.TO has underperformed LDOS with an annualized return of 7.02%, while LDOS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.


CTC-A.TO

1D
2.50%
1M
4.41%
6M
15.34%
YTD
16.65%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
7.02%
ALL TIME*
7.96%

LDOS

1D
1.69%
1M
6.61%
6M
-39.69%
YTD
-35.65%
1Y
-28.08%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
13.87%
ALL TIME*
7.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$29.10MCA$30.86MCA$38.50M
CA$209.68MCA$238.57MCA$260.25M

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTC-A.TO
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd
16.65%20.07%12.82%3.76%-19.20%11.26%24.13%0.73%-11.01%19.72%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
-35.65%20.73%45.91%2.02%27.65%-14.24%6.37%81.04%-9.71%20.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CTC-A.TO and LDOS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CTC-A.TO:

CA$10.46B

LDOS:

$14.11B

EPS

CTC-A.TO:

CA$11.22

LDOS:

$10.92

PE Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

17.73

LDOS:

10.27

PEG Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

0.35

LDOS:

0.08

PS Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

0.65

LDOS:

0.84

PB Ratio

CTC-A.TO:

1.81

LDOS:

2.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTC-A.TO:

CA$16.43B

LDOS:

$17.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTC-A.TO:

CA$5.41B

LDOS:

$3.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

CTC-A.TO:

CA$2.09B

LDOS:

$2.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTC-A.TO
CTC-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CTC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LDOS
LDOS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LDOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDOS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LDOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDOS Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTC-A.TOLDOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.85

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

-0.58

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

-1.26

+2.37

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the LDOS Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTC-A.TO and LDOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTC-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, roughly equal to the maximum LDOS drawdown of -57.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTC-A.TO and LDOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTC-A.TOLDOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-57.48%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-48.82%

+33.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.70%

-48.82%

+19.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

-48.82%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.16%

-48.82%

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-43.19%

+43.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-21.73%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.05%

22.32%

-14.27%

Volatility

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) is 6.12%, while Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that CTC-A.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTC-A.TOLDOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

9.23%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

26.27%

-10.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.52%

31.29%

-8.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.16%

27.41%

-5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.89%

28.06%

-2.17%

Dividends

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS - Dividend Comparison

CTC-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than LDOS's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTC-A.TO
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd
3.60%4.08%4.63%4.90%4.13%2.59%2.72%2.97%2.52%1.59%1.67%1.79%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
1.51%0.90%1.07%1.35%1.37%1.57%1.29%1.35%2.43%1.98%29.17%3.41%

Financials

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd and Leidos Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.50B4.00B4.50B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
3.57B
4.40B
(CTC-A.TO) Total Revenue
(LDOS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CTC-A.TO values in CAD, LDOS values in USD

CTC-A.TO vs. LDOS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd and Leidos Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
34.0%
17.3%
Portfolio components
CTC-A.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 3.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.

LDOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.

CTC-A.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported an operating income of 254.30M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

LDOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 508.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

CTC-A.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a net income of 107.00M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

LDOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 328.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CTC-A.TO and LDOS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTC-A.TO and LDOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer