CTAS vs. MUU
CTAS (Cintas Corporation) is a stock, while MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Over the past year, CTAS returned -2.72% vs 2599.25% for MUU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CTAS vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAS achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 449.17% return.
CTAS
- 1D
- 7.22%
- 1M
- 16.72%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- -2.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 25.11%
MUU
- 1D
- -12.02%
- 1M
- -37.86%
- 6M
- 305.92%
- YTD
- 449.17%
- 1Y
- 2,599.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTAS vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 10.22% | 3.78% | -12.49% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 449.17% | 599.03% | -40.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAS and MUU is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024 | -0.02 |
The correlation between CTAS and MUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAS vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
CTAS
MUU
CTAS vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTAS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.63 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 47.69 | -47.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 152.81 | -152.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTAS vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAS drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAS and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -75.07% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.23% | -55.25% | +28.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.54% | -55.25% | +46.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.05% | -23.62% | +8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.81% | 17.31% | -0.50% |
Volatility
CTAS vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is 11.21%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 62.52%. This indicates that CTAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 62.52% | -51.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.89% | 125.23% | -106.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.88% | 152.52% | -129.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 142.32% | -119.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 142.32% | -115.42% |
Dividends
CTAS vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than MUU's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 0.87% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 1.24% | 4.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAS and MUU have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (62.52%) compared to CTAS (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTAS dropped -65.32% vs MUU's -75.07%.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.30 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTAS and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer