PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTAS vs. CWST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CTAS vs. CWST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CTAS vs. CWST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
-9.86%3.78%22.24%34.82%2.97%26.51%32.74%61.73%9.04%36.32%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
-18.99%-7.44%23.81%7.75%-7.15%37.89%34.59%61.57%23.76%85.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CTAS:

$68.81B

CWST:

$5.04B

EPS

CTAS:

$4.75

CWST:

$0.12

PE Ratio

CTAS:

35.63

CWST:

640.10

PS Ratio

CTAS:

6.26

CWST:

2.74

PB Ratio

CTAS:

14.37

CWST:

3.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTAS:

$11.03B

CWST:

$1.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTAS:

$1.33B

CWST:

$236.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

CTAS:

$2.66B

CWST:

$391.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAS achieves a -9.86% return, which is significantly higher than CWST's -18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CTAS has underperformed CWST with an annualized return of 23.61%, while CWST has yielded a comparatively higher 27.85% annualized return.


CTAS

1D
0.28%
1M
-15.91%
YTD
-9.86%
6M
-17.21%
1Y
-17.00%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*
23.61%

CWST

1D
1.22%
1M
-14.83%
YTD
-18.99%
6M
-16.38%
1Y
-28.85%
3Y*
-1.36%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
27.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTAS vs. CWST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTAS
CTAS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CTAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CTAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

CWST
CWST Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CWST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWST Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CWST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWST Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTAS vs. CWST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTASCWSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.80

-0.93

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.02

-1.23

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.85

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

-0.75

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-1.55

+0.23

CTAS vs. CWST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTAS Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is comparable to the CWST Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTAS and CWST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTASCWSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

-0.93

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.15

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.91

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.09

+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between CTAS and CWST is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CTAS vs. CWST - Dividend Comparison

CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while CWST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
1.03%0.89%0.80%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.99%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CTAS vs. CWST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAS drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, smaller than the maximum CWST drawdown of -98.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAS and CWST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CTASCWSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.32%

-98.52%

+33.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.72%

-37.72%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-37.72%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.38%

-37.72%

-10.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.20%

-34.09%

+8.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.99%

-53.18%

+38.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.22%

18.32%

-6.10%

Volatility

CTAS vs. CWST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is 7.96%, while Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) has a volatility of 14.69%. This indicates that CTAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CTASCWSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

14.69%

-6.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.35%

24.61%

-10.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.38%

31.04%

-9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.49%

26.14%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.52%

30.59%

-4.07%

Financials

CTAS vs. CWST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cintas Corporation and Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.84B
469.06M
(CTAS) Total Revenue
(CWST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CTAS vs. CWST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cintas Corporation and Casella Waste Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
-97.8%
0
Portfolio components
CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.

CWST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 469.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

CWST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.73M and revenue of 469.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

CWST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -2.51M and revenue of 469.06M, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.