CWST vs. VGT
CWST (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, CWST returned 25.23%/yr vs 24.06%/yr for VGT. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CWST vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWST achieves a -8.40% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 20.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CWST having a 25.23% annualized return and VGT not far behind at 24.06%.
CWST
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -7.98%
- 6M
- -11.07%
- YTD
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- -12.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 25.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.89%
VGT
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 21.30%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 34.81%
- 3Y*
- 26.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 24.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.56M | $64.85M | $62.44M | |
| $440.89M | $515.41M | $573.34M |
CWST vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | -8.40% | -7.44% | 23.81% | 7.75% | -7.15% | 37.89% | 34.59% | 61.57% | 23.76% | 85.50% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 20.36% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWST and VGT is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.34 |
The correlation between CWST and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWST vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
CWST
VGT
CWST vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWST | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.23 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 1.94 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 5.23 | -6.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWST vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWST drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWST and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWST | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.52% | -54.63% | -43.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.16% | -16.40% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -27.23% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -35.07% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | -35.07% | -2.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.47% | -9.93% | -15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.88% | -7.95% | -44.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 6.07% | +10.44% |
Volatility
CWST vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.42%. This indicates that CWST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWST | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.55% | 8.42% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.90% | 20.14% | +8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.06% | 24.28% | +10.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 25.83% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 24.89% | +6.06% |
Dividends
CWST vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
CWST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWST and VGT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWST has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to VGT (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWST dropped -98.52% vs VGT's -54.63%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWST and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer