CTAS vs. CHAT
CTAS (Cintas Corporation) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, CTAS returned 19.06%/yr vs 45.97%/yr for CHAT. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CTAS vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAS achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 51.14% return.
CTAS
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 12.99%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 1Y
- -8.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 16.62%
- 10Y*
- 23.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.28%
CHAT
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- 6M
- 50.12%
- YTD
- 51.14%
- 1Y
- 78.97%
- 3Y*
- 45.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 48.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.53M | $57.41M | $65.64M | |
| $532.74M | $525.09M | $429.66M |
CTAS vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 7.63% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 30.20% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 51.14% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAS and CHAT is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.14 |
The correlation between CTAS and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAS vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
CTAS
CHAT
CTAS vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTAS | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.32 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 2.80 | -3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 9.68 | -10.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTAS vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAS drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAS and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAS | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -31.34% | -33.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.23% | -28.34% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | -31.34% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.70% | -14.37% | +3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -5.77% | -9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.93% | 8.18% | +8.75% |
Volatility
CTAS vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is 10.76%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.97%. This indicates that CTAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAS | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 16.97% | -6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.70% | 34.87% | -15.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.24% | 39.55% | -16.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 32.58% | -9.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.80% | 32.58% | -5.78% |
Dividends
CTAS vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than CHAT's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.89% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 0.89% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAS and CHAT have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (16.97%) compared to CTAS (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTAS dropped -65.32% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTAS and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer