CTAP vs. VABS
CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and VABS (Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify, while VABS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. CTAP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for VABS.
Performance
CTAP vs. VABS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly higher than VABS's 2.03% return.
CTAP
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VABS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP vs. VABS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 8.12% | 2.22% |
VABS Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF | 2.03% | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAP and VABS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAP vs. VABS — Risk / Return Rank
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VABS
CTAP vs. VABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTAP | VABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTAP vs. VABS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, which is greater than VABS's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and VABS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAP | VABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -7.12% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.31% | 0.00% | -15.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -1.39% | -3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility
CTAP vs. VABS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAP | VABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.35% | 1.91% | +22.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 2.30% | +22.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 2.23% | +22.12% |
CTAP vs. VABS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VABS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTAP vs. VABS - Dividend Comparison
CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than VABS's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VABS Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF | 5.05% | 4.94% | 5.05% | 4.13% | 2.47% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAP and VABS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VABS.
VABS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 1.84% for CTAP.
CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VABS is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.39% for VABS.
Find the right allocation for CTAP and VABS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer