CTAP vs. RSBT
CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify, while RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CTAP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for RSBT.
Performance
CTAP vs. RSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than RSBT's 4.41% return.
CTAP
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RSBT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 4.41%
- 1Y
- 22.66%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.32M | $7.01M | $3.57M | |
| $575.14K | $784.75K | $843.96K |
CTAP vs. RSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 8.91% | 2.22% |
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 4.41% | 2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAP and RSBT is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAP vs. RSBT — Risk / Return Rank
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSBT
CTAP vs. RSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTAP | RSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTAP vs. RSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum RSBT drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and RSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAP | RSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -23.60% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.68% | -5.65% | -9.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -12.22% | +6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.53% | — |
Volatility
CTAP vs. RSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAP | RSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.78% | 14.01% | +10.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 13.75% | +11.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 13.75% | +11.03% |
CTAP vs. RSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTAP vs. RSBT - Dividend Comparison
CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than RSBT's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 3.07% | 3.20% | 0.00% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAP and RSBT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.
RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 1.83% for CTAP.
CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while RSBT is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.97% for RSBT.
Find the right allocation for CTAP and RSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer