CTA vs. AQMIX
CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and AQMIX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 3 years, CTA returned 11.34%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for AQMIX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTA charges 0.78%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for AQMIX.
Performance
CTA vs. AQMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTA achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than AQMIX's 13.79% return.
CTA
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 13.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AQMIX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 15.67%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
CTA vs. AQMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 10.72% | 0.88% | 24.15% | -2.23% | 9.55% |
AQMIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 13.79% | 14.62% | 8.13% | 2.08% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTA and AQMIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2022 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTA vs. AQMIX — Risk / Return Rank
CTA
AQMIX
CTA vs. AQMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTA | AQMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.54 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 8.64 | -7.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 26.76 | -23.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTA | AQMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 3.00 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.43 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
CTA vs. AQMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTA drawdown since its inception was -18.07%, smaller than the maximum AQMIX drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTA and AQMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTA | AQMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.07% | -26.52% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -3.02% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.23% | -13.57% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.15% | 0.00% | -9.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -10.00% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 0.97% | +3.26% |
Volatility
CTA vs. AQMIX - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX) at 2.63%. This indicates that CTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTA | AQMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 2.63% | +5.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 6.62% | +10.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.17% | 8.69% | +11.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 11.63% | +4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 10.37% | +6.22% |
CTA vs. AQMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTA has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than AQMIX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTA vs. AQMIX - Dividend Comparison
CTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than AQMIX's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQMIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 1.99% | 2.26% | 3.83% | 8.39% | 12.76% | 6.94% | 5.31% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 6.51% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 4.92% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTA and AQMIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTA has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to AQMIX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTA dropped -18.07% vs AQMIX's -26.52%.
AQMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTA and AQMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer