CSZIX vs. FRINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX).
CSZIX is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Oct 1, 2014. FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
CSZIX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSZIX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 1.50% | 4.41% | 6.81% | 13.26% | -26.21% | 41.81% | -1.64% | 31.95% | -4.17% | 8.18% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | -0.08% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSZIX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than FRINX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CSZIX has outperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 6.42%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.00% annualized return.
CSZIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSZIX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSZIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSZIX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank
CSZIX
FRINX
CSZIX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSZIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | 0.86 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 1.16 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.17 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 1.03 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 4.35 | -3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSZIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 0.86 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.56 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.53 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.75 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSZIX and FRINX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSZIX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison
CSZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than FRINX's 4.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 3.10% | 3.81% | 2.85% | 3.00% | 7.77% | 4.38% | 5.47% | 7.70% | 3.68% | 2.60% | 5.90% | 22.32% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.40% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
CSZIX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSZIX drawdown since its inception was -42.71%, which is greater than FRINX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSZIX and FRINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSZIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.71% | -34.50% | -8.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -4.28% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.05% | -18.30% | -14.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | -34.50% | -8.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -3.12% | -4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -3.41% | -5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 1.01% | +1.95% |
Volatility
CSZIX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.55%. This indicates that CSZIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSZIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 1.55% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 2.84% | +6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 4.92% | +11.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 6.51% | +12.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 9.50% | +11.29% |