CSZIX vs. CREMX
CSZIX (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z) and CREMX (Redwood Real Estate Income Fund) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSZIX returned 11.95% vs 7.56% for CREMX. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSZIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 5.16%/yr for CREMX.
Performance
CSZIX vs. CREMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSZIX achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than CREMX's 3.06% return.
CSZIX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- 11.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.26%
CREMX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSZIX vs. CREMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 10.80% | 4.41% | 6.81% | 9.68% |
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund | 3.06% | 7.72% | 8.09% | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSZIX and CREMX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSZIX vs. CREMX — Risk / Return Rank
CSZIX
CREMX
CSZIX vs. CREMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSZIX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -183.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 184.40 | -183.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 192.57 | -191.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.46 | 3,038.69 | -3,034.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSZIX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 17.83 | -16.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 8.97 | -8.61 |
Drawdowns
CSZIX vs. CREMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSZIX drawdown since its inception was -42.71%, which is greater than CREMX's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSZIX and CREMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSZIX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.71% | -0.71% | -42.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.96% | -0.04% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | 0.00% | -3.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -0.02% | -8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 0.00% | +2.60% |
Volatility
CSZIX vs. CREMX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) at 0.13%. This indicates that CSZIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CREMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSZIX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 0.13% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 0.30% | +9.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 0.43% | +12.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 0.86% | +17.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 0.86% | +19.95% |
CSZIX vs. CREMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSZIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CREMX's 5.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSZIX vs. CREMX - Dividend Comparison
CSZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than CREMX's 7.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund | 7.14% | 7.38% | 7.64% | 1.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 3.51% | 3.81% | 2.85% | 3.00% | 7.77% | 4.38% | 5.47% | 7.70% | 3.68% | 2.60% | 5.90% | 22.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSZIX and CREMX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSZIX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to CREMX (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSZIX dropped -42.71% vs CREMX's -0.71%.
CREMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.83 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSZIX and CREMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer