PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSXRX vs. BKTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSXRX vs. BKTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class R6 (CSXRX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSXRX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than BKTSX's 10.02% return.


CSXRX

1D
1.07%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
11.70%
6M
10.84%
1Y
23.64%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*

BKTSX

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.21%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSXRX vs. BKTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSXRX
Calvert US Large Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class R6
11.70%15.96%24.19%27.32%-21.64%25.71%26.19%32.83%-4.07%4.39%
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
10.02%17.15%23.83%26.02%-19.05%25.56%20.82%31.12%-5.37%4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CSXRX and BKTSX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2017

0.99

The correlation between CSXRX and BKTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSXRX vs. BKTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSXRX
CSXRX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CSXRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSXRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSXRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CSXRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSXRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BKTSX
BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSXRX vs. BKTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class R6 (CSXRX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSXRXBKTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.54

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

11.18

+0.04

CSXRX vs. BKTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSXRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the BKTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSXRX and BKTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSXRX vs. BKTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSXRX drawdown since its inception was -32.82%, smaller than the maximum BKTSX drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSXRX and BKTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSXRXBKTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.82%

-34.97%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-8.87%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.93%

-19.29%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-24.98%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-1.53%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-4.51%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.01%

+0.16%

Volatility

CSXRX vs. BKTSX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class R6 (CSXRX) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) at 4.91%. This indicates that CSXRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSXRXBKTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

4.91%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

10.04%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

12.78%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

17.47%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

18.39%

+1.24%

CSXRX vs. BKTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSXRX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BKTSX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSXRX vs. BKTSX - Dividend Comparison

CSXRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than BKTSX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
1.06%1.14%1.27%1.46%1.64%1.58%1.51%2.15%2.49%2.17%1.54%
CSXRX
Calvert US Large Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class R6
4.89%5.47%1.83%1.08%1.28%1.07%0.97%1.17%4.40%2.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, CSXRX and BKTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CSXRX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to BKTSX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSXRX dropped -32.82% vs BKTSX's -34.97%.

CSXRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSXRX and BKTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer