CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CSX5.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSX5.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSX5.L returned 10.27%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for ISAC.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSX5.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.

Performance

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CSX5.L is traded in EUR, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSX5.L achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CSX5.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 10.27%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.

CSX5.L

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: 11.38%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

ISAC.L

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 25.54%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 12.25%
• 10Y*: 12.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSX5.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc	6.76%	21.71%	11.38%	22.29%	-8.36%	23.37%	-2.27%	28.04%	-11.52%	10.61%
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	11.97%	7.84%	25.58%	18.90%	-13.09%	27.74%	6.13%	28.60%	-5.49%	9.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CSX5.L and ISAC.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2011	0.75

The correlation between CSX5.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSX5.L	ISAC.L
Financial Services	25.0%	17.3%
Industrials	21.4%	9.0%
Technology	17.0%	33.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	4.4%
Energy	5.3%	3.6%
Healthcare	5.3%	7.8%
Utilities	4.7%	2.2%
Basic Materials	3.5%	2.9%
Communication Services	2.5%	8.6%
Real Estate	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSX5.L

CSX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
CSX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CSX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CSX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CSX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CSX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

ISAC.L

ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSX5.L	ISAC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	2.05	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.90	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.38	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	3.99	-2.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.63	15.22	-10.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSX5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSX5.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSX5.L	ISAC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	2.05	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.83	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.77	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.79	-0.36

Drawdowns

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSX5.L drawdown since its inception was -37.87%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSX5.L and ISAC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSX5.L	ISAC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.87%	-33.27%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.87%	-6.37%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.34%	-20.27%	+3.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.61%	-20.27%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.87%	-33.27%	-4.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-1.32%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.97%	-4.28%	-2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	1.67%	+1.54%

Volatility

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.43%. This indicates that CSX5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSX5.L	ISAC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	3.43%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.52%	9.32%	+3.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.65%	12.41%	+3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	14.81%	+2.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.20%	15.82%	+2.38%

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSX5.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSX5.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSX5.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSX5.L and ISAC.L in my portfolio?

CSX5.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSX5.L or ISAC.L?

On fees, CSX5.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSX5.L or ISAC.L?

CSX5.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.

What is the main difference between CSX5.L and ISAC.L?

CSX5.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. CSX5.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSX5.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.