CSX vs. NVT
CSX (CSX Corporation) and NVT (nVent Electric plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CSX in Railroads, NVT in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 5 years, CSX returned 9.45%/yr vs 41.15%/yr for NVT. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSX vs. NVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSX achieves a 32.06% return, which is significantly lower than NVT's 63.18% return.
CSX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 32.06%
- 6M
- 28.04%
- 1Y
- 50.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 20.06%
NVT
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 63.18%
- 6M
- 63.60%
- 1Y
- 145.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.46%
- 5Y*
- 41.15%
- 10Y*
- —
CSX vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSX CSX Corporation | 32.06% | 14.13% | -5.65% | 13.51% | -16.58% | 25.70% | 27.09% | 18.06% | 5.60% |
NVT nVent Electric plc | 63.18% | 51.27% | 16.63% | 55.98% | 3.32% | 67.15% | -5.68% | 17.24% | 7.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSX and NVT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSX and NVT has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CSX:
$88.58B
NVT:
$27.20B
CSX:
$1.63
NVT:
$3.00
CSX:
29.10
NVT:
55.32
CSX:
6.27
NVT:
6.29
CSX:
6.52
NVT:
7.16
CSX:
$14.15B
NVT:
$4.33B
CSX:
$3.64B
NVT:
$1.60B
CSX:
$5.55B
NVT:
$857.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSX vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank
CSX
NVT
CSX vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSX Corporation (CSX) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSX | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.51 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 8.30 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.06 | 28.25 | -17.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSX vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSX drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSX and NVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSX | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -56.18% | -13.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.89% | -16.93% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.44% | -46.67% | +17.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -46.67% | +17.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.98% | +5.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.91% | -11.82% | -4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 4.96% | -0.52% |
Volatility
CSX vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CSX Corporation (CSX) is 6.54%, while nVent Electric plc (NVT) has a volatility of 12.76%. This indicates that CSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSX | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 12.76% | -6.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.14% | 32.57% | -16.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 41.19% | -18.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 36.06% | -12.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.82% | 38.49% | -10.67% |
Dividends
CSX vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison
CSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than NVT's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSX CSX Corporation | 1.14% | 1.43% | 1.49% | 1.27% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.15% | 1.33% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 2.00% | 2.70% |
NVT nVent Electric plc | 0.49% | 0.78% | 1.12% | 1.18% | 1.82% | 1.84% | 3.01% | 2.74% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CSX vs. NVT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CSX Corporation and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSX vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison
CSX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSX Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NVT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.
CSX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSX Corporation reported an operating income of 1.25B and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
NVT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.
CSX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSX Corporation reported a net income of 807.00M and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in a net margin of 23.2%.
NVT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSX and NVT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVT has higher volatility (12.76%) compared to CSX (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSX dropped -69.19% vs NVT's -56.18%.
NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSX and NVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer