CSWC vs. BAESY
CSWC (Capital Southwest Corporation) and BAESY (BAE Systems PLC) are both stocks. CSWC operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while BAESY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CSWC returned 17.30%/yr vs 18.72%/yr for BAESY. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSWC vs. BAESY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSWC having a 11.14% return and BAESY slightly higher at 11.25%. Over the past 10 years, CSWC has underperformed BAESY with an annualized return of 17.30%, while BAESY has yielded a comparatively higher 18.72% annualized return.
CSWC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 26.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 17.30%
BAESY
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- -1.39%
- 3Y*
- 30.63%
- 5Y*
- 30.61%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
CSWC vs. BAESY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSWC Capital Southwest Corporation | 11.14% | 14.28% | 2.14% | 56.10% | -24.63% | 57.40% | -1.56% | 22.80% | 29.52% | 9.99% |
BAESY BAE Systems PLC | 11.25% | 65.51% | 1.23% | 40.91% | 46.40% | 14.56% | -3.43% | 34.69% | -22.16% | 13.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSWC and BAESY is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
CSWC:
$1.47B
BAESY:
$77.52B
CSWC:
$1.76
BAESY:
£5.29
CSWC:
13.38
BAESY:
14.41
CSWC:
1.01
BAESY:
2.65
CSWC:
6.81
BAESY:
1.06
CSWC:
1.45
BAESY:
4.92
CSWC:
$222.04M
BAESY:
£54.56B
CSWC:
$172.70M
BAESY:
£19.72B
CSWC:
$142.78M
BAESY:
£7.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSWC vs. BAESY — Risk / Return Rank
CSWC
BAESY
CSWC vs. BAESY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSWC | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.03 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 0.02 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 0.04 | +5.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSWC vs. BAESY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSWC drawdown since its inception was -68.33%, which is greater than BAESY's maximum drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSWC and BAESY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSWC | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.33% | -59.20% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.75% | -23.59% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | -23.59% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.66% | -23.59% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.15% | -42.13% | -19.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -16.92% | +14.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -19.32% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 10.17% | -5.28% |
Volatility
CSWC vs. BAESY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is 5.25%, while BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that CSWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAESY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSWC | BAESY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 10.68% | -5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 25.10% | -11.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 31.92% | -12.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 28.12% | -5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 27.90% | -0.50% |
Dividends
CSWC vs. BAESY - Dividend Comparison
CSWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than BAESY's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAESY BAE Systems PLC | 1.90% | 1.90% | 2.79% | 2.40% | 3.09% | 4.46% | 7.05% | 3.66% | 4.93% | 5.71% | 6.26% | 4.38% |
CSWC Capital Southwest Corporation | 9.80% | 11.56% | 11.59% | 10.21% | 12.46% | 10.13% | 11.49% | 13.07% | 10.77% | 7.01% | 2.35% | 216.86% |
Financials
CSWC vs. BAESY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capital Southwest Corporation and BAE Systems PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSWC vs. BAESY - Profitability Comparison
CSWC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported a gross profit of 54.00M and revenue of 54.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BAESY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
CSWC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported an operating income of 44.66M and revenue of 54.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 82.7%.
BAESY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
CSWC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported a net income of 27.48M and revenue of 54.00M, resulting in a net margin of 50.9%.
BAESY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSWC and BAESY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAESY has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to CSWC (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSWC dropped -68.33% vs BAESY's -59.20%.
CSWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSWC and BAESY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer