PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSWC vs. ATH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSWC vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSWC is traded in USD, while ATH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSWC achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly lower than ATH.TO's 39.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CSWC has underperformed ATH.TO with an annualized return of 17.25%, while ATH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.58% annualized return.


CSWC

1D
1.60%
1M
2.39%
YTD
12.25%
6M
13.58%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
17.25%

ATH.TO

1D
0.17%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
39.89%
6M
40.02%
1Y
74.64%
3Y*
49.11%
5Y*
55.47%
10Y*
20.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSWC vs. ATH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
12.25%14.28%2.14%56.10%-24.63%57.40%-1.56%22.80%29.52%9.99%
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
39.89%38.20%17.84%77.25%90.45%600.35%-70.49%-37.84%-14.65%-44.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CSWC and ATH.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.15

The correlation between CSWC and ATH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSWC:

$1.47B

ATH.TO:

CA$4.95B

EPS

CSWC:

$1.75

ATH.TO:

CA$0.45

PE Ratio

CSWC:

13.47

ATH.TO:

22.82

PEG Ratio

CSWC:

1.02

ATH.TO:

0.87

PS Ratio

CSWC:

6.85

ATH.TO:

3.71

PB Ratio

CSWC:

1.45

ATH.TO:

2.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSWC:

$222.04M

ATH.TO:

CA$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSWC:

$172.70M

ATH.TO:

CA$518.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

CSWC:

$142.78M

ATH.TO:

CA$505.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSWC vs. ATH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSWC
CSWC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSWC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CSWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ATH.TO
ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSWC vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSWCATH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.24

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

10.81

-6.62

CSWC vs. ATH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSWC Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSWC and ATH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSWC vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSWC drawdown since its inception was -68.33%, smaller than the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSWC and ATH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSWCATH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.33%

-99.59%

+31.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.75%

-23.14%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.74%

-29.96%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.66%

-47.55%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.15%

-94.92%

+33.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-62.47%

+61.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-76.83%

+58.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

6.93%

-2.01%

Volatility

CSWC vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is 5.07%, while Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that CSWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSWCATH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

13.05%

-7.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.21%

31.88%

-17.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

37.71%

-18.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

49.97%

-27.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

61.94%

-34.52%

Dividends

CSWC vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison

CSWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%, while ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
10.89%11.56%11.59%10.21%12.46%10.13%11.49%13.07%10.77%7.01%2.35%216.86%

Financials

CSWC vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capital Southwest Corporation and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
54.00M
377.38M
(CSWC) Total Revenue
(ATH.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CSWC values in USD, ATH.TO values in CAD

CSWC vs. ATH.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Capital Southwest Corporation and Athabasca Oil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
100.0%
35.8%
Portfolio components
CSWC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported a gross profit of 54.00M and revenue of 54.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ATH.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 134.91M and revenue of 377.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

CSWC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported an operating income of 44.66M and revenue of 54.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 82.7%.

ATH.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 90.74M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

CSWC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported a net income of 27.48M and revenue of 54.00M, resulting in a net margin of 50.9%.

ATH.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSWC and ATH.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSWC and ATH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer