CSW vs. TT
CSW (CSW Industrials Inc) and TT (Trane Technologies plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past year, CSW returned -5.39% vs 9.76% for TT. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSW vs. TT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSW achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly lower than TT's 18.29% return.
CSW
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- -7.13%
- 6M
- -14.57%
- 1Y
- -5.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TT
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 9.76%
- 3Y*
- 37.71%
- 5Y*
- 21.39%
- 10Y*
- 23.76%
CSW vs. TT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | -7.13% | -4.50% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 18.29% | -8.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSW and TT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.45 |
Fundamentals
CSW:
$4.55B
TT:
$102.24B
CSW:
$6.68
TT:
$12.94
CSW:
40.71
TT:
35.43
CSW:
2.65
TT:
1.62
CSW:
4.21
TT:
4.75
CSW:
4.33
TT:
11.87
CSW:
$1.08B
TT:
$21.60B
CSW:
$453.68M
TT:
$7.76B
CSW:
$211.08M
TT:
$4.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSW vs. TT — Risk / Return Rank
CSW
TT
CSW vs. TT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSW Industrials Inc (CSW) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSW | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.08 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 0.45 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 0.89 | -1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSW vs. TT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSW drawdown since its inception was -25.35%, smaller than the maximum TT drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSW and TT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSW | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.35% | -77.91% | +52.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.56% | -19.97% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.67% | -6.75% | -11.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -14.83% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.90% | 10.12% | +4.78% |
Volatility
CSW vs. TT - Volatility Comparison
CSW Industrials Inc (CSW) has a higher volatility of 12.34% compared to Trane Technologies plc (TT) at 9.05%. This indicates that CSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSW | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.34% | 9.05% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.67% | 21.82% | +8.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.46% | 27.50% | +12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.37% | 27.38% | +12.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.37% | 28.34% | +12.03% |
Dividends
CSW vs. TT - Dividend Comparison
CSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than TT's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | 0.41% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 0.87% | 0.97% | 0.91% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% |
Financials
CSW vs. TT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CSW Industrials Inc and Trane Technologies plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSW vs. TT - Profitability Comparison
CSW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a gross profit of 126.61M and revenue of 308.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
TT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
CSW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported an operating income of 37.44M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
TT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
CSW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
TT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSW and TT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSW has higher volatility (12.34%) compared to TT (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSW dropped -25.35% vs TT's -77.91%.
TT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSW and TT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer