PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSW-B.TO vs. BIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Corby Spirit and Wine Limited (CSW-B.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSW-B.TO is traded in CAD, while BIP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BIP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSW-B.TO achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than BIP's 16.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CSW-B.TO has underperformed BIP with an annualized return of 3.77%, while BIP has yielded a comparatively higher 14.39% annualized return.


CSW-B.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.36%
YTD
3.47%
6M
7.01%
1Y
18.54%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
3.77%

BIP

1D
-0.38%
1M
8.07%
YTD
16.08%
6M
12.52%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
14.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSW-B.TO
Corby Spirit and Wine Limited
3.47%24.68%12.32%-15.07%-9.11%11.08%14.37%-8.13%-12.87%8.09%
BIP
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
16.08%9.87%15.54%4.30%-15.08%26.62%13.50%43.94%-12.30%30.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CSW-B.TO and BIP is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSW-B.TO:

CA$405.40M

BIP:

$17.84B

EPS

CSW-B.TO:

CA$1.16

BIP:

$0.91

PE Ratio

CSW-B.TO:

12.23

BIP:

42.84

PS Ratio

CSW-B.TO:

1.49

BIP:

0.74

PB Ratio

CSW-B.TO:

2.13

BIP:

3.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSW-B.TO:

CA$272.58M

BIP:

$24.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSW-B.TO:

CA$132.34M

BIP:

$6.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSW-B.TO:

CA$67.23M

BIP:

$11.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSW-B.TO
CSW-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CSW-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSW-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSW-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSW-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSW-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BIP
BIP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corby Spirit and Wine Limited (CSW-B.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSW-B.TOBIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

2.01

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

4.52

+3.93

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSW-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the BIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSW-B.TO and BIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSW-B.TOBIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.36

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.55

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.85

-0.56

Drawdowns

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSW-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than BIP's maximum drawdown of -46.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSW-B.TO and BIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSW-B.TOBIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.11%

-46.79%

-23.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.92%

-12.18%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.38%

-39.14%

+21.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.27%

-44.37%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-46.79%

+11.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-0.38%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.74%

-6.61%

-10.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

5.39%

-3.24%

Volatility

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Corby Spirit and Wine Limited (CSW-B.TO) is 3.01%, while Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that CSW-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSW-B.TOBIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

4.94%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

14.77%

-5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

18.80%

-5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

24.62%

-8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

26.08%

-8.53%

Dividends

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP - Dividend Comparison

CSW-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than BIP's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIP
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
4.56%4.95%5.10%4.86%4.65%3.35%3.92%4.02%5.44%3.88%4.62%5.59%
CSW-B.TO
Corby Spirit and Wine Limited
6.60%6.47%7.05%7.21%6.43%5.11%5.22%5.91%7.72%4.04%3.84%7.97%

Financials

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corby Spirit and Wine Limited and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
58.27M
6.30B
(CSW-B.TO) Total Revenue
(BIP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CSW-B.TO values in CAD, BIP values in USD

CSW-B.TO vs. BIP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Corby Spirit and Wine Limited and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
51.0%
26.9%
Portfolio components
CSW-B.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corby Spirit and Wine Limited reported a gross profit of 29.73M and revenue of 58.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.

BIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

CSW-B.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corby Spirit and Wine Limited reported an operating income of 11.86M and revenue of 58.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

BIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

CSW-B.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corby Spirit and Wine Limited reported a net income of 7.93M and revenue of 58.27M, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

BIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSW-B.TO and BIP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSW-B.TO and BIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer