PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSUS.AS vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSUS.AS vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSUS.AS is traded in EUR, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSUS.AS achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUS.AS has outperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 14.77%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.57% annualized return.


CSUS.AS

1D
-0.02%
1M
5.45%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.33%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
14.34%
10Y*
14.77%

ACWI

1D
0.16%
1M
5.15%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.38%
1Y
27.07%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUS.AS vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSUS.AS
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.31%4.04%33.96%22.33%-15.27%37.95%10.18%32.81%-0.73%6.52%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
13.75%7.89%25.20%18.61%-13.33%27.54%6.75%29.45%-4.92%9.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUS.AS and ACWI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2014

0.60

The correlation between CSUS.AS and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSUS.AS vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSUS.AS
CSUS.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CSUS.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUS.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUS.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUS.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUS.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUS.AS vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSUS.ASACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.82

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

15.98

-4.00

CSUS.AS vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUS.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUS.AS and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSUS.ASACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.21

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.82

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.74

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.55

+0.35

Drawdowns

CSUS.AS vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUS.AS drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUS.AS and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSUS.ASACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-45.79%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-7.11%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-20.51%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.49%

-20.51%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-32.80%

-1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.39%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-6.43%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.70%

+0.41%

Volatility

CSUS.AS vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) is 2.74%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that CSUS.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSUS.ASACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

3.03%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

9.28%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

12.29%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

15.11%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

16.96%

-0.73%

CSUS.AS vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSUS.AS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSUS.AS vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

CSUS.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
CSUS.AS
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSUS.AS and ACWI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CSUS.AS.

CSUS.AS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. CSUS.AS tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CSUS.AS and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSUS.AS and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer