PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CSUS.AS vs. DGRO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CSUS.ASDGRO
YTD Return31.03%21.23%
1Y Return38.59%33.72%
3Y Return (Ann)11.83%8.55%
5Y Return (Ann)15.93%12.22%
10Y Return (Ann)14.36%12.07%
Sharpe Ratio3.013.32
Sortino Ratio4.054.70
Omega Ratio1.631.62
Calmar Ratio4.243.79
Martin Ratio18.8322.54
Ulcer Index1.94%1.44%
Daily Std Dev12.10%9.76%
Max Drawdown-34.08%-35.10%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CSUS.AS and DGRO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CSUS.AS achieves a 31.03% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 21.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUS.AS has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 14.36%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.56%
12.34%
CSUS.AS
DGRO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSUS.AS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


CSUS.AS
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Expense ratio chart for CSUS.AS: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for DGRO: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSUS.AS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSUS.AS, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSUS.AS, currently valued at 4.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CSUS.AS, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.60
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSUS.AS, currently valued at 4.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CSUS.AS, currently valued at 18.50, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.50
DGRO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DGRO, currently valued at 3.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DGRO, currently valued at 4.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DGRO, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DGRO, currently valued at 5.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DGRO, currently valued at 20.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0020.14

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUS.AS Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUS.AS and DGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.04
3.08
CSUS.AS
DGRO

Dividends

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

CSUS.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CSUS.AS
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
2.15%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%0.97%

Drawdowns

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUS.AS drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUS.AS and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
CSUS.AS
DGRO

Volatility

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 3.49% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.49%
3.37%
CSUS.AS
DGRO