CSUS.AS vs. DGRO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).

CSUS.AS and DGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSUS.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both CSUS.AS and DGRO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSUS.AS iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-3.31%	4.04%	33.96%	22.33%	-15.27%	37.95%	10.18%	32.81%	-0.73%	6.52%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	3.16%	1.96%	24.32%	7.16%	-2.20%	36.12%	0.47%	32.80%	2.20%	7.88%

Different Trading Currencies

CSUS.AS is traded in EUR, while DGRO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSUS.AS achieves a -3.31% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUS.AS has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 13.48%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.64% annualized return.

CSUS.AS

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -2.91%
• YTD: -3.31%
• 6M: -0.34%
• 1Y: 10.04%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 11.56%
• 10Y*: 13.48%

DGRO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.44%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 5.37%
• 1Y: 8.66%
• 3Y*: 12.16%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSUS.AS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.

CSUS.AS

iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

Return for Risk

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSUS.AS

CSUS.AS Risk / Return Rank: 52
CSUS.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CSUS.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CSUS.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
CSUS.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CSUS.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 63
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSUS.AS	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	0.52	+0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	0.80	+0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.12	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	0.65	+2.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.06	2.40	+7.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUS.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUS.AS and DGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSUS.AS	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57	0.52	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.76	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.73	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.76	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between CSUS.AS and DGRO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

CSUS.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUS.AS iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	2.10%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%

Drawdowns

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUS.AS drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUS.AS and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSUS.AS	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.08%	-35.10%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.33%	-10.92%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.49%	-19.31%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.08%	-35.10%	+1.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.40%	-4.70%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.46%	-3.48%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.37%	-0.23%

Volatility

CSUS.AS vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.91%. This indicates that CSUS.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSUS.AS	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	2.91%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.65%	7.76%	+0.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.40%	16.83%	+0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	13.96%	+1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.27%	17.36%	-1.09%