PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSUAY vs. DFJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSUAY vs. DFJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSUAY achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly lower than DFJ's 12.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAY has outperformed DFJ with an annualized return of 23.30%, while DFJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.


CSUAY

1D
-3.06%
1M
-0.44%
6M
3.22%
YTD
10.19%
1Y
36.78%
3Y*
29.34%
5Y*
33.45%
10Y*
23.30%

DFJ

1D
-0.68%
1M
0.07%
6M
7.96%
YTD
12.07%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUAY vs. DFJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd
10.19%28.25%34.09%34.21%38.61%40.38%-2.68%1.33%-12.77%96.35%
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
12.07%31.90%2.80%21.81%-9.00%0.38%1.29%16.98%-18.53%32.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUAY and DFJ is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2008

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between CSUAY and DFJ has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSUAY vs. DFJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSUAY
CSUAY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CSUAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DFJ
DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUAY vs. DFJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSUAYDFJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.20

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

5.96

-1.31

CSUAY vs. DFJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the DFJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUAY and DFJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSUAY vs. DFJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUAY drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than DFJ's maximum drawdown of -46.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAY and DFJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSUAYDFJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-46.00%

-42.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.69%

-13.03%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.14%

-13.03%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-29.71%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.27%

-40.02%

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.84%

-4.35%

-9.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.93%

-11.12%

-35.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.94%

4.80%

+3.14%

Volatility

CSUAY vs. DFJ - Volatility Comparison

China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd (CSUAY) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) at 5.02%. This indicates that CSUAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSUAYDFJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.26%

5.02%

+6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.20%

14.27%

+10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.16%

17.00%

+21.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.26%

15.97%

+17.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.46%

16.94%

+15.52%

Dividends

CSUAY vs. DFJ - Dividend Comparison

CSUAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than DFJ's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd
5.46%9.11%7.29%10.66%13.21%10.39%7.89%5.07%5.46%29.22%5.13%8.19%
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.62%2.68%2.46%2.43%2.62%2.07%2.59%2.24%1.89%1.60%1.76%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSUAY and DFJ have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSUAY has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to DFJ (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAY dropped -88.12% vs DFJ's -46.00%.

DFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSUAY and DFJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer