CSUAX vs. VMVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX).
CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017. VMVFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
CSUAX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUAX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 1.71% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than VMVFX's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX has underperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 7.48%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.02% annualized return.
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
VMVFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUAX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
VMVFX
CSUAX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 0.90 | +0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.30 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.20 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.06 | +1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 5.20 | +5.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.90 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.93 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.72 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.78 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and VMVFX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, less than VMVFX's 9.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.81% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and VMVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -33.09% | -19.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -7.96% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -13.02% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -33.09% | -1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -6.03% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -2.84% | -5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 1.63% | +0.20% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.61%. This indicates that CSUAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 2.61% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 4.87% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 10.02% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 10.75% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 12.48% | +2.41% |