CSUAX vs. GQRPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX).
CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017. GQRPX is managed by GQG Partners. It was launched on Mar 28, 2019.
Performance
CSUAX vs. GQRPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUAX vs. GQRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 10.28% |
GQRPX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund | 7.72% | 0.67% | 19.98% | 19.56% | -3.77% | 16.94% | 14.55% | 12.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than GQRPX's 7.72% return.
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
GQRPX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 7.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUAX vs. GQRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRPX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. GQRPX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
GQRPX
CSUAX vs. GQRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUAX | GQRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 0.71 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.01 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.15 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 0.84 | +1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 2.97 | +7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUAX | GQRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.71 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.79 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.71 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and GQRPX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. GQRPX - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than GQRPX's 7.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
GQRPX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund | 7.05% | 7.60% | 6.35% | 1.22% | 2.93% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. GQRPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than GQRPX's maximum drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and GQRPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | GQRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -28.88% | -23.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -9.04% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -20.39% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -3.41% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -5.00% | -3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.55% | -0.72% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. GQRPX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) at 3.10%. This indicates that CSUAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | GQRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 3.10% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 6.73% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 11.90% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 14.70% | -1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 17.41% | -2.52% |