CSUAX vs. FOF
CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) and FOF (Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund) are both mutual funds - CSUAX is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index, while FOF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. CSUAX is passively managed, while FOF is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX returned 7.22%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for FOF. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CSUAX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FOF.
Performance
CSUAX vs. FOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than FOF's 7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX has underperformed FOF with an annualized return of 7.22%, while FOF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.
CSUAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.25%
FOF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- 6M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $593.20K | $586.25K | $705.33K |
CSUAX vs. FOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 12.09% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | 7.58% | 13.01% | 23.65% | 17.90% | -22.69% | 28.24% | 1.52% | 31.37% | -9.43% | 23.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and FOF is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2006 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSUAX and FOF has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. FOF — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
FOF
CSUAX vs. FOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSUAX | FOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.96 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 2.84 | +6.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. FOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum FOF drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and FOF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | FOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -59.38% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | -15.07% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.83% | -18.58% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -29.96% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -49.74% | +14.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -6.06% | +4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -9.32% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 5.09% | -3.19% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. FOF - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) have volatilities of 2.93% and 3.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | FOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 3.04% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 11.67% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 14.18% | -4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 18.01% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 20.34% | -5.46% |
CSUAX vs. FOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FOF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. FOF - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, which matches FOF's 7.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.63% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | 7.68% | 7.91% | 8.22% | 9.32% | 9.99% | 7.06% | 8.41% | 7.78% | 9.41% | 7.84% | 8.90% | 9.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSUAX and FOF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FOF has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to CSUAX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAX dropped -52.20% vs FOF's -59.38%.
CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSUAX and FOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer