CSUAX vs. CSUIX
CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) and CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) are both mutual funds - CSUAX is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index, while CSUIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Cohen & Steers. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX returned 7.38%/yr vs 7.73%/yr for CSUIX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CSUAX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CSUIX.
Performance
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSUAX having a 9.47% return and CSUIX slightly higher at 9.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSUAX having a 7.38% annualized return and CSUIX not far ahead at 7.73%.
CSUAX
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- 1Y
- 16.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 16.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.47% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 9.60% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and CSUIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2004 | 1.00 |
The correlation between CSUAX and CSUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
CSUIX
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.83 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | 9.50 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.74 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and CSUIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -52.01% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | -5.96% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -14.89% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -20.01% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -35.01% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -3.34% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -8.16% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.77% | +0.02% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.11% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 7.81% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.68% | 9.68% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 12.97% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 14.90% | +0.02% |
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, less than CSUIX's 7.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.39% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.67% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, CSUAX and CSUIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CSUAX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to CSUIX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAX dropped -52.20% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.
CSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSUAX and CSUIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer