CSUAX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSUAX having a 8.35% return and CSUIX slightly higher at 8.44%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSUAX having a 7.48% annualized return and CSUIX not far ahead at 7.83%.
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
CSUIX
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 1.67 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.21 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.42 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 10.58 | -0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.67 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.64 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.53 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and CSUIX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, less than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -52.01% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -7.99% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -20.01% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -35.01% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -4.36% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -8.21% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 1.82% | +0.01% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) have volatilities of 3.26% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 3.24% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 6.90% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 11.49% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 12.86% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 14.88% | +0.01% |