CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO
CSU.TO (Constellation Software Inc.) and TFII.TO (TFI International Inc.) are both stocks. CSU.TO operates in Software - Application (Technology), while TFII.TO operates in Trucking (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CSU.TO returned 19.62%/yr vs 27.43%/yr for TFII.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSU.TO achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than TFII.TO's 58.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CSU.TO has underperformed TFII.TO with an annualized return of 19.62%, while TFII.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 27.43% annualized return.
CSU.TO
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- 15.43%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- -10.91%
- 1Y
- -39.36%
- 3Y*
- 2.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 19.62%
TFII.TO
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 58.86%
- 6M
- 60.15%
- 1Y
- 87.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 27.43%
CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | -11.38% | -25.63% | 35.48% | 55.70% | -9.70% | 42.28% | 31.55% | 47.35% | 15.20% | 25.68% |
TFII.TO TFI International Inc. | 58.86% | -25.45% | 9.01% | 34.47% | -3.27% | 118.27% | 53.29% | 27.01% | 9.91% | -3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSU.TO and TFII.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.16 |
The correlation between CSU.TO and TFII.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CSU.TO:
CA$61.96B
TFII.TO:
CA$18.48B
CSU.TO:
$34.85
TFII.TO:
$3.93
CSU.TO:
60.01
TFII.TO:
40.81
CSU.TO:
3.65
TFII.TO:
1.55
CSU.TO:
11.40
TFII.TO:
4.97
CSU.TO:
$12.15B
TFII.TO:
$8.59B
CSU.TO:
$5.28B
TFII.TO:
$1.03B
CSU.TO:
$3.23B
TFII.TO:
$1.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CSU.TO
TFII.TO
CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and TFI International Inc. (TFII.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSU.TO | TFII.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.36 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 4.10 | -4.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 13.08 | -14.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, smaller than the maximum TFII.TO drawdown of -79.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSU.TO and TFII.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSU.TO | TFII.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.38% | -79.23% | +22.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.16% | -20.53% | -34.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.38% | -51.49% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.38% | -51.49% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.38% | -51.49% | -4.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.48% | -1.54% | -41.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -16.77% | +9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.99% | 6.42% | +29.57% |
Volatility
CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to TFI International Inc. (TFII.TO) at 9.93%. This indicates that CSU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFII.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSU.TO | TFII.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.21% | 9.93% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.06% | 26.55% | +7.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.43% | 37.24% | +4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 35.98% | -7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.44% | 34.79% | -7.35% |
Dividends
CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO - Dividend Comparison
CSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than TFII.TO's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.24% | 0.17% | 0.32% | 1.85% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.71% | 0.81% |
TFII.TO TFI International Inc. | 1.13% | 1.78% | 1.17% | 1.08% | 1.08% | 0.68% | 1.63% | 2.24% | 2.46% | 2.37% | 2.01% | 2.88% |
Financials
CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc. and TFI International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSU.TO vs. TFII.TO - Profitability Comparison
CSU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a gross profit of 731.81M and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
TFII.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TFI International Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.80M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.
CSU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported an operating income of 451.48M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
TFII.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TFI International Inc. reported an operating income of 84.82M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.
CSU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a net income of 360.99M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
TFII.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TFI International Inc. reported a net income of 42.60M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSU.TO and TFII.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CSU.TO and TFII.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer