PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSU.TO vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSU.TO is traded in CAD, while GOOGL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOOGL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSU.TO achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 17.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CSU.TO has underperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of 19.62%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.84% annualized return.


CSU.TO

1D
-4.38%
1M
15.43%
YTD
-11.38%
6M
-10.91%
1Y
-39.36%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
19.62%

GOOGL

1D
0.72%
1M
-8.51%
YTD
17.40%
6M
18.11%
1Y
112.22%
3Y*
45.24%
5Y*
28.11%
10Y*
26.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSU.TO
Constellation Software Inc.
-11.38%-25.63%35.48%55.70%-9.70%42.28%31.55%47.35%15.20%25.68%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
17.40%58.42%47.52%54.56%-35.23%65.21%27.75%22.89%7.54%23.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CSU.TO and GOOGL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2006

0.21

The correlation between CSU.TO and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSU.TO:

CA$61.96B

GOOGL:

$4.40T

EPS

CSU.TO:

$34.85

GOOGL:

$13.11

PE Ratio

CSU.TO:

60.01

GOOGL:

27.43

PEG Ratio

CSU.TO:

3.15

GOOGL:

1.35

PS Ratio

CSU.TO:

3.65

GOOGL:

10.40

PB Ratio

CSU.TO:

11.40

GOOGL:

9.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSU.TO:

$12.15B

GOOGL:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSU.TO:

$5.28B

GOOGL:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSU.TO:

$3.23B

GOOGL:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSU.TO
CSU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CSU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CSU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSU.TOGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.61

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

5.86

-6.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

19.93

-21.05

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSU.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSU.TO and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOGL drawdown of -56.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSU.TO and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSU.TOGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.38%

-56.06%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.16%

-18.86%

-36.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.38%

-31.02%

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.38%

-39.63%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.38%

-39.63%

-16.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.48%

-8.82%

-34.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-11.98%

+5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.99%

5.54%

+30.45%

Volatility

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) at 7.59%. This indicates that CSU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSU.TOGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.21%

7.59%

+6.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.06%

20.92%

+13.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.43%

29.27%

+12.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.53%

31.92%

-3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.44%

29.84%

-2.40%

Dividends

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

CSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than GOOGL's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSU.TO
Constellation Software Inc.
0.19%0.17%0.12%0.16%0.24%0.17%0.32%1.85%0.50%0.57%0.71%0.81%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.24%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
3.13B
109.90B
(CSU.TO) Total Revenue
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSU.TO vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Constellation Software Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
23.4%
62.5%
Portfolio components
CSU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a gross profit of 731.81M and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

CSU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported an operating income of 451.48M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

CSU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a net income of 360.99M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSU.TO and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSU.TO and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer