CSTK vs. RSBY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CSTK (Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSTK is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Invesco, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSTK returned 24.47% vs 18.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. CSTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

CSTK vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSTK achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 19.01% return.

CSTK

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.80%
• 6M: 10.73%
• YTD: 14.36%
• 1Y: 24.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.03%
• 6M: 18.44%
• YTD: 19.01%
• 1Y: 18.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSTK vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF	14.36%	18.16%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	19.01%	0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CSTK and RSBY is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

CSTK vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSTK

CSTK Risk / Return Rank: 79
CSTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CSTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CSTK Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CSTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CSTK Martin Ratio Rank: 75

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 56
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSTK vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSTK	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.62	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.34	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.28	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	2.32	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.87	5.39	+5.48

CSTK vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSTK Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSTK and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSTK vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSTK drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTK and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSTK	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.87%	-23.32%	+14.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.87%	-7.95%	-0.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-6.07%	+5.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.19%	-13.29%	+12.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	3.41%	-1.15%

Volatility

CSTK vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) is 2.52%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) has a volatility of 3.17%. This indicates that CSTK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSTK	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	3.17%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	8.39%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.26%	11.40%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.45%	13.34%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.45%	13.34%	-1.89%

CSTK vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSTK vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

CSTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than RSBY's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF	2.14%	1.44%	0.00%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.74%	2.07%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSTK and RSBY in my portfolio?

CSTK and RSBY have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSTK or RSBY?

RSBY has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to CSTK (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTK dropped -8.87% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, CSTK or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, CSTK leads with 24.47% vs 18.35% for RSBY. On fees, CSTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSTK has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSTK or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, CSTK has performed better with a 24.47% return vs 18.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSTK or RSBY?

CSTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSTK or RSBY?

CSTK has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.74% for RSBY.

What is the main difference between CSTK and RSBY?

CSTK is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSTK and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.