CSTIX vs. CHY
CSTIX (Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund) and CHY (Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - CSTIX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Calamos, while CHY is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos. Over the past 5 years, CSTIX returned 2.53%/yr vs 6.53%/yr for CHY. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSTIX charges 0.40%/yr vs 2.64%/yr for CHY.
Performance
CSTIX vs. CHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSTIX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than CHY's 23.99% return.
CSTIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.53%
- 10Y*
- —
CHY
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 23.99%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 41.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
CSTIX vs. CHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTIX Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund | 0.24% | 6.11% | 4.91% | 4.76% | -3.04% | 0.13% | 4.06% | 4.84% | 0.62% |
CHY Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund | 23.99% | 3.97% | 17.24% | 20.78% | -28.05% | 22.17% | 36.75% | 32.63% | -27.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSTIX and CHY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018 | 0.17 |
The correlation between CSTIX and CHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSTIX vs. CHY — Risk / Return Rank
CSTIX
CHY
CSTIX vs. CHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund (CSTIX) and Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSTIX | CHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.47 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.68 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 17.99 | -7.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSTIX vs. CHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSTIX drawdown since its inception was -6.03%, smaller than the maximum CHY drawdown of -60.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTIX and CHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSTIX | CHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -60.53% | +54.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | -11.42% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.35% | -24.32% | +22.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.03% | -35.99% | +29.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.07% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -9.09% | +8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 2.33% | -1.99% |
Volatility
CSTIX vs. CHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund (CSTIX) is 0.66%, while Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that CSTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSTIX | CHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 6.05% | -5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.42% | 14.09% | -12.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01% | 16.36% | -14.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.28% | 19.43% | -17.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 23.31% | -21.18% |
CSTIX vs. CHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSTIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CHY's 2.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSTIX vs. CHY - Dividend Comparison
CSTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than CHY's 8.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHY Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund | 8.92% | 10.61% | 9.88% | 10.46% | 11.37% | 7.42% | 7.14% | 8.72% | 12.13% | 10.13% | 11.37% | 11.42% |
CSTIX Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund | 4.20% | 4.55% | 4.46% | 3.02% | 2.56% | 3.37% | 3.38% | 3.43% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSTIX and CHY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHY has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to CSTIX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTIX dropped -6.03% vs CHY's -60.53%.
CHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSTIX and CHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer