PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSTIX vs. CTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSTIX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund (CSTIX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSTIX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 36.73% return.


CSTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.62%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*

CTSIX

1D
3.44%
1M
5.72%
YTD
36.73%
6M
32.94%
1Y
69.70%
3Y*
34.00%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSTIX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CSTIX
Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund
0.24%6.11%4.91%4.76%-3.04%0.13%4.06%2.09%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
36.73%25.90%44.34%7.57%-37.30%9.12%63.38%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CSTIX and CTSIX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019

0.13

The correlation between CSTIX and CTSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSTIX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSTIX
CSTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CSTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CTSIX
CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSTIX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund (CSTIX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSTIXCTSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

5.58

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

22.02

-11.10

CSTIX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSTIX and CTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSTIX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSTIX drawdown since its inception was -6.03%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTIX and CTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSTIXCTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-50.83%

+44.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-12.38%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.35%

-28.40%

+27.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.03%

-50.60%

+44.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

0.00%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-20.51%

+19.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

3.13%

-2.79%

Volatility

CSTIX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund (CSTIX) is 0.66%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that CSTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSTIXCTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

11.81%

-11.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.42%

23.25%

-21.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01%

29.34%

-27.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.28%

28.34%

-26.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.13%

29.93%

-27.80%

CSTIX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSTIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSTIX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

CSTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CSTIX
Calamos Short-Term Bond Fund
4.20%4.55%4.46%3.02%2.56%3.37%3.38%3.43%0.72%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.77%4.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSTIX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTSIX has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to CSTIX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTIX dropped -6.03% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.

CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSTIX and CTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer