CSSPX.MI vs. CSNDX.MI
CSSPX.MI (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSNDX.MI (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSSPX.MI is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while CSNDX.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX.MI returned 15.03%/yr vs 21.38%/yr for CSNDX.MI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSSPX.MI charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CSNDX.MI.
Performance
CSSPX.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSPX.MI achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly lower than CSNDX.MI's 21.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX.MI has underperformed CSNDX.MI with an annualized return of 15.03%, while CSNDX.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 21.38% annualized return.
CSSPX.MI
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 11.68%
- YTD
- 21.40%
- 6M
- 20.37%
- 1Y
- 38.93%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.38%
CSSPX.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSPX.MI iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.49% | 4.27% | 33.76% | 22.03% | -14.58% | 40.89% | 7.57% | 34.27% | -1.05% | 6.71% |
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 21.40% | 6.74% | 35.09% | 50.07% | -30.24% | 39.83% | 35.45% | 41.91% | 3.62% | 16.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSPX.MI and CSNDX.MI is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2010 | 0.87 |
The correlation between CSSPX.MI and CSNDX.MI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSPX.MI vs. CSNDX.MI — Risk / Return Rank
CSSPX.MI
CSNDX.MI
CSSPX.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSSPX.MI | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 3.91 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.82 | 11.55 | +1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSPX.MI | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.50 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.95 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 1.08 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.08 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
CSSPX.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSPX.MI drawdown since its inception was -33.56%, which is greater than CSNDX.MI's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX.MI and CSNDX.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSPX.MI | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.56% | -31.19% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -9.95% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.26% | -26.71% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.26% | -31.19% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -31.19% | -2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | 0.00% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -5.43% | +1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.37% | -1.36% |
Volatility
CSSPX.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI) is 2.69%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that CSSPX.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSNDX.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSPX.MI | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 4.17% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 10.75% | -3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 15.68% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 19.79% | -4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 19.61% | -3.52% |
CSSPX.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSPX.MI has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CSNDX.MI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSPX.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSSPX.MI nor CSNDX.MI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CSSPX.MI and CSNDX.MI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CSSPX.MI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSPX.MI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
CSSPX.MI is categorized as S&P 500, while CSNDX.MI is Nasdaq-100. CSSPX.MI tracks S&P 500 Index, while CSNDX.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSSPX.MI and 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
Find the right allocation for CSSPX.MI and CSNDX.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer