CSSC.DE vs. XLME.DE
CSSC.DE (CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP) and XLME.DE (21Shares Stellar ETP) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSSC.DE returned 6.55%/yr vs 25.76%/yr for XLME.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSSC.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for XLME.DE.
Performance
CSSC.DE vs. XLME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSC.DE achieves a -31.24% return, which is significantly lower than XLME.DE's -2.01% return.
CSSC.DE
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- -15.26%
- YTD
- -31.24%
- 6M
- -38.90%
- 1Y
- -40.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLME.DE
- 1D
- -6.58%
- 1M
- 31.94%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- -18.50%
- 1Y
- -26.44%
- 3Y*
- 25.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSSC.DE vs. XLME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSC.DE CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP | -31.24% | -35.55% | 50.17% | 86.11% |
XLME.DE 21Shares Stellar ETP | -2.01% | -45.22% | 165.66% | 38.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSC.DE and XLME.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CSSC.DE and XLME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSC.DE vs. XLME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSSC.DE
XLME.DE
CSSC.DE vs. XLME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) and 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSSC.DE | XLME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.00 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.37 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -0.55 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSC.DE | XLME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 | -0.34 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.10 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
CSSC.DE vs. XLME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSC.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum XLME.DE drawdown of -82.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSC.DE and XLME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSC.DE | XLME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -82.74% | +17.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.70% | -70.51% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.21% | -78.28% | +13.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.95% | -68.57% | +3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.09% | -62.68% | +34.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.93% | 47.90% | -8.97% |
Volatility
CSSC.DE vs. XLME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) is 10.56%, while 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE) has a volatility of 32.82%. This indicates that CSSC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSC.DE | XLME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.56% | 32.82% | -22.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.99% | 51.83% | -14.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.25% | 78.47% | -24.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.64% | 88.68% | -29.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.64% | 88.68% | -29.04% |
CSSC.DE vs. XLME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSC.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XLME.DE's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSC.DE vs. XLME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSSC.DE nor XLME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSC.DE and XLME.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSC.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for XLME.DE.
They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and 21Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CSSC.DE and 2.50% for XLME.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSSC.DE and XLME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer