CSSC.DE vs. CTEN.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) and CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE).
CSSC.DE and CTEN.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSSC.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Mar 27, 2023. CTEN.DE is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Mar 27, 2023.
Performance
CSSC.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSSC.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSC.DE CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP | -24.98% | -35.55% | 50.17% | 86.11% |
CTEN.DE CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP | -25.68% | -19.43% | 96.51% | 53.65% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSSC.DE having a -24.98% return and CTEN.DE slightly lower at -25.68%.
CSSC.DE
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- -24.98%
- 6M
- -51.86%
- 1Y
- -22.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEN.DE
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- -25.68%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- 1Y
- -18.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSSC.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSC.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEN.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CSSC.DE vs. CTEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSSC.DE
CTEN.DE
CSSC.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) and CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSSC.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | -0.36 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | -0.20 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | -0.37 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | -0.76 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSC.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | -0.36 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.41 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSC.DE and CTEN.DE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSSC.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSSC.DE nor CTEN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CSSC.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSC.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than CTEN.DE's maximum drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSC.DE and CTEN.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSC.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -56.27% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.70% | -56.27% | -5.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.76% | -52.57% | -9.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.26% | -17.36% | -8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.43% | 27.08% | +4.35% |
Volatility
CSSC.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) and CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) have volatilities of 14.27% and 14.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSSC.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.27% | 14.48% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.39% | 38.61% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.72% | 52.22% | +7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.74% | 52.83% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.74% | 52.83% | +7.91% |