CSRSX vs. HLRRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund (CSRSX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX).
CSRSX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Jul 2, 1991. HLRRX is managed by REMSGroup. It was launched on Dec 16, 2002.
Performance
CSRSX vs. HLRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSRSX vs. HLRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSRSX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund | 2.82% | 2.84% | 6.35% | 12.70% | -24.94% | 42.25% | -2.87% | 33.12% | -5.10% | 7.09% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 5.63% | -9.13% | 9.45% | 10.50% | -21.40% | 40.50% | -3.78% | 31.75% | -13.63% | -1.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSRSX achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly lower than HLRRX's 5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CSRSX has outperformed HLRRX with an annualized return of 6.12%, while HLRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.18% annualized return.
CSRSX
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
HLRRX
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSRSX vs. HLRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSRSX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than HLRRX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSRSX vs. HLRRX — Risk / Return Rank
CSRSX
HLRRX
CSRSX vs. HLRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund (CSRSX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSRSX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | 0.03 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.32 | 0.15 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.02 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.08 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 0.20 | +0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSRSX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.03 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.12 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.20 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.32 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSRSX and HLRRX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSRSX vs. HLRRX - Dividend Comparison
CSRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than HLRRX's 7.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSRSX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund | 2.28% | 3.00% | 2.60% | 3.50% | 7.52% | 3.68% | 4.73% | 16.29% | 5.36% | 8.88% | 13.49% | 13.37% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 7.60% | 9.39% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 13.71% | 17.02% | 9.10% | 2.44% | 2.68% | 17.61% | 15.94% | 10.13% |
Drawdowns
CSRSX vs. HLRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSRSX drawdown since its inception was -72.51%, which is greater than HLRRX's maximum drawdown of -62.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRSX and HLRRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSRSX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.51% | -62.78% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -11.74% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.65% | -28.99% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.66% | -48.13% | +6.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -10.96% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -8.52% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 4.34% | -1.04% |
Volatility
CSRSX vs. HLRRX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund (CSRSX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) at 4.14%. This indicates that CSRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSRSX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 4.14% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 8.92% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 15.60% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 17.57% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 20.81% | -0.25% |