CSQ vs. TSLX
CSQ (Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund) is Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Calamos, while TSLX (Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CSQ returned 16.38%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for TSLX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSQ vs. TSLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSQ achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly higher than TSLX's -20.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CSQ has outperformed TSLX with an annualized return of 16.38%, while TSLX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.35% annualized return.
CSQ
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
TSLX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -20.08%
- 6M
- -21.60%
- 1Y
- -21.35%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
CSQ vs. TSLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | 8.10% | 16.25% | 28.11% | 20.80% | -24.26% | 30.77% | 26.22% | 38.62% | -4.89% | 27.98% |
TSLX Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. | -20.08% | 11.52% | 8.83% | 35.29% | -16.37% | 32.33% | 9.77% | 29.62% | 0.36% | 15.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSQ and TSLX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014 | 0.37 |
The correlation between CSQ and TSLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSQ vs. TSLX — Risk / Return Rank
CSQ
TSLX
CSQ vs. TSLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSQ | TSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.86 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | -0.77 | +2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | -1.42 | +7.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSQ vs. TSLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSQ drawdown since its inception was -67.17%, which is greater than TSLX's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSQ and TSLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSQ | TSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.17% | -50.27% | -16.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.25% | -27.94% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.18% | -27.94% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.09% | -28.77% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.21% | -50.27% | +2.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -27.82% | +25.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -9.10% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 15.08% | -11.50% |
Volatility
CSQ vs. TSLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) is 5.74%, while Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that CSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSQ | TSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 7.90% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 20.66% | -8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 24.63% | -9.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 19.40% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 21.47% | +1.55% |
Dividends
CSQ vs. TSLX - Dividend Comparison
CSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, less than TSLX's 11.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | 6.72% | 6.51% | 6.95% | 8.27% | 9.17% | 6.38% | 7.03% | 7.14% | 9.35% | 8.20% | 9.64% | 10.00% |
TSLX Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. | 11.42% | 9.44% | 9.81% | 9.72% | 10.34% | 15.35% | 11.08% | 8.43% | 9.84% | 8.84% | 8.35% | 9.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSQ and TSLX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLX has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to CSQ (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSQ dropped -67.17% vs TSLX's -50.27%.
CSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSQ and TSLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer