TSLX vs. WHF
TSLX (Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.) and WHF (WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, TSLX returned 10.94%/yr vs 7.98%/yr for WHF. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLX vs. WHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLX achieves a -21.20% return, which is significantly lower than WHF's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TSLX has outperformed WHF with an annualized return of 10.94%, while WHF has yielded a comparatively lower 7.98% annualized return.
TSLX
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -21.20%
- 6M
- -20.17%
- 1Y
- -22.87%
- 3Y*
- 6.24%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
WHF
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- -11.96%
- 3Y*
- -6.52%
- 5Y*
- -3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
TSLX vs. WHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLX Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. | -21.20% | 11.52% | 8.83% | 35.29% | -16.37% | 32.33% | 9.77% | 29.62% | 0.36% | 15.47% |
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 1.11% | -15.36% | -8.52% | 6.26% | -6.23% | 25.77% | 19.14% | 20.83% | 4.80% | 21.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLX and WHF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014 | 0.31 |
The correlation between TSLX and WHF shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TSLX:
$1.54B
WHF:
$145.21M
TSLX:
$436.19
WHF:
$0.69
TSLX:
0.04
WHF:
9.52
TSLX:
0.02
WHF:
3.15
TSLX:
0.00
WHF:
0.58
TSLX:
$91.48B
WHF:
$47.81M
TSLX:
$215.15M
WHF:
$14.33M
TSLX:
$192.45M
WHF:
-$4.37M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLX vs. WHF — Risk / Return Rank
TSLX
WHF
TSLX vs. WHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLX | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.95 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | -0.45 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | -0.82 | -0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLX vs. WHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLX drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum WHF drawdown of -57.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLX and WHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLX | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -57.48% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.83% | -26.51% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.83% | -37.91% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.83% | -37.91% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.27% | -57.48% | +7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.83% | -29.51% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -9.00% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.58% | 14.53% | +1.05% |
Volatility
TSLX vs. WHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) is 7.42%, while WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a volatility of 10.10%. This indicates that TSLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLX | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 10.10% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.78% | 20.68% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.67% | 28.23% | -3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 22.97% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 31.57% | -10.08% |
Dividends
TSLX vs. WHF - Dividend Comparison
TSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.63%, less than WHF's 18.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLX Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. | 11.63% | 9.44% | 9.81% | 9.72% | 10.34% | 15.35% | 11.08% | 8.43% | 9.84% | 8.84% | 8.35% | 9.62% |
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 18.02% | 20.72% | 18.44% | 12.60% | 11.26% | 10.03% | 13.96% | 11.79% | 11.16% | 10.58% | 11.67% | 12.37% |
Financials
TSLX vs. WHF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TSLX vs. WHF - Profitability Comparison
TSLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 91.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 15.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TSLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 91.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
WHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 15.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TSLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. reported a net income of 41.05B and revenue of 91.19B, resulting in a net margin of 45.0%.
WHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported a net income of 5.73M and revenue of 15.86M, resulting in a net margin of 36.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLX and WHF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WHF has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to TSLX (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLX dropped -50.27% vs WHF's -57.48%.
WHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLX and WHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer