CSQ vs. CTRIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) and Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX).
CSQ is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 26, 2004. CTRIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Jun 27, 2007.
Performance
CSQ vs. CTRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSQ vs. CTRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | -8.21% | 16.25% | 28.11% | 20.80% | -24.26% | 30.77% | 26.22% | 38.62% | -4.89% | 27.98% |
CTRIX Calamos Total Return Bond Fund | -0.41% | 7.31% | 1.49% | 4.78% | -12.91% | -1.27% | 6.97% | 9.24% | -1.10% | 3.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSQ achieves a -8.21% return, which is significantly lower than CTRIX's -0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CSQ has outperformed CTRIX with an annualized return of 14.98%, while CTRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.61% annualized return.
CSQ
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -8.21%
- 6M
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
CTRIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSQ vs. CTRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSQ has a 2.46% expense ratio, which is higher than CTRIX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSQ vs. CTRIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSQ
CTRIX
CSQ vs. CTRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) and Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSQ | CTRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.95 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.72 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 5.16 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSQ | CTRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.95 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.02 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.35 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.50 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSQ and CTRIX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CSQ vs. CTRIX - Dividend Comparison
CSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, more than CTRIX's 3.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | 7.42% | 6.51% | 6.95% | 8.27% | 9.17% | 6.38% | 7.03% | 7.14% | 9.35% | 8.20% | 9.64% | 10.00% |
CTRIX Calamos Total Return Bond Fund | 3.59% | 3.90% | 3.63% | 2.61% | 2.71% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.79% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 2.76% | 4.68% |
Drawdowns
CSQ vs. CTRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSQ drawdown since its inception was -67.17%, which is greater than CTRIX's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSQ and CTRIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSQ | CTRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.17% | -17.84% | -49.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -2.71% | -12.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.09% | -17.84% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.21% | -17.84% | -30.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.68% | -2.42% | -8.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -3.04% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 0.90% | +3.10% |
Volatility
CSQ vs. CTRIX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) at 1.63%. This indicates that CSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSQ | CTRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 1.63% | +5.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 2.52% | +9.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 4.35% | +16.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 5.51% | +14.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 4.57% | +18.36% |