CTRIX vs. CHYDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CTRIX (Calamos Total Return Bond Fund) and CHYDX (Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - CTRIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Calamos, while CHYDX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Calamos. Over the past 10 years, CTRIX returned 1.55%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for CHYDX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTRIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for CHYDX.

Performance

CTRIX vs. CHYDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) and Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRIX achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than CHYDX's 1.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CTRIX has underperformed CHYDX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while CHYDX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.06% annualized return.

CTRIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: -0.02%
• 1Y: 5.23%
• 3Y*: 3.88%
• 5Y*: 0.05%
• 10Y*: 1.55%

CHYDX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: 8.29%
• 5Y*: 3.85%
• 10Y*: 5.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTRIX vs. CHYDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTRIX Calamos Total Return Bond Fund	0.07%	7.31%	1.49%	4.78%	-12.91%	-1.27%	6.97%	9.24%	-1.10%	3.32%
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund	1.90%	6.72%	7.78%	12.26%	-10.35%	6.44%	4.78%	14.29%	-4.30%	6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CTRIX and CHYDX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2007	0.18

Over the past year, CTRIX and CHYDX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CTRIX vs. CHYDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTRIX

CTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 23
CTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

CHYDX

CHYDX Risk / Return Rank: 90
CHYDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CHYDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CHYDX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CHYDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CHYDX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTRIX vs. CHYDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) and Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTRIX	CHYDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	3.00	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	4.79	-2.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.70	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	3.86	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	17.99	-12.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTRIX vs. CHYDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the CHYDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRIX and CHYDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTRIX	CHYDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	3.00	-1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.95	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	1.02	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	1.06	-0.55

Drawdowns

CTRIX vs. CHYDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRIX drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum CHYDX drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRIX and CHYDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTRIX	CHYDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.84%	-35.03%	+17.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.79%	-1.73%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.23%	-3.50%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.84%	-13.66%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.84%	-23.35%	+5.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	0.00%	-1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-2.77%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	0.37%	+0.56%

Volatility

CTRIX vs. CHYDX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) at 0.69%. This indicates that CTRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHYDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTRIX	CHYDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	0.69%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	1.72%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87%	2.22%	+1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.54%	4.07%	+1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.59%	4.97%	-0.38%

CTRIX vs. CHYDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTRIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CHYDX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTRIX vs. CHYDX - Dividend Comparison

CTRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than CHYDX's 6.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund	6.07%	6.39%	6.30%	6.28%	5.47%	4.48%	5.26%	5.85%	6.62%	4.87%	4.94%	5.43%
CTRIX Calamos Total Return Bond Fund	3.55%	3.90%	3.63%	2.61%	2.71%	3.46%	2.42%	2.79%	2.89%	3.29%	2.76%	4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTRIX and CHYDX in my portfolio?

CTRIX and CHYDX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTRIX or CHYDX?

CTRIX has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to CHYDX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTRIX dropped -17.84% vs CHYDX's -35.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHYDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.