PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSPX.AS vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSPX.AS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSPX.AS is traded in EUR, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPX.AS achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 87.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.AS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.01%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.04% annualized return.


CSPX.AS

1D
0.26%
1M
1.26%
YTD
11.94%
6M
12.66%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
15.01%

SMH

1D
6.12%
1M
15.88%
YTD
87.78%
6M
89.80%
1Y
155.67%
3Y*
60.84%
5Y*
41.66%
10Y*
38.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPX.AS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.94%4.00%33.87%22.28%-14.24%40.26%7.72%32.99%-0.36%7.13%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
87.78%31.47%48.28%68.18%-29.41%52.76%42.71%68.17%-4.78%21.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPX.AS and SMH is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2010

0.46

The correlation between CSPX.AS and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSPX.AS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSPX.AS
CSPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPX.AS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSPX.ASSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.63

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

12.42

-8.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

41.37

-27.75

CSPX.AS vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPX.AS and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSPX.AS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPX.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -54.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.AS and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSPX.ASSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-54.70%

+21.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-12.35%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-36.90%

+13.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-36.90%

+13.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

-36.90%

+3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-10.69%

+6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.70%

-1.68%

Volatility

CSPX.AS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) is 3.25%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that CSPX.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSPX.ASSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

17.01%

-13.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

27.48%

-19.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

33.77%

-22.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

34.92%

-19.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

32.80%

-16.73%

CSPX.AS vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSPX.AS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSPX.AS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CSPX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSPX.AS and SMH have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

CSPX.AS is categorized as S&P 500, while SMH is Semiconductors. CSPX.AS tracks S&P 500 Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.AS and 0.35% for SMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSPX.AS and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer